California officials blast DOJ lawsuit over immigration laws as ‘stunt’

Jeff Sessions

Trump administration escalates tensions with California with lawsuit over immigration laws.

The Department of Justice’s crusade against immigrants escalated Tuesday with a lawsuit against California over the state’s current immigration laws. California politicians responded forcefully, refusing to be bullied by an overreaching federal government.

The lawsuit is focused on three California “sanctuary state” laws that deal with how state law enforcement agencies and businesses interact with federal immigration agencies.

The Trump administration, led by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, claims the laws are unconstitutional.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra disagrees. “We are doing nothing to intrude on the work of federal government to do immigration enforcement,” he said. “We are doing what we believe is best to make sure the people of California are safe.”

Other California officials spoke up without hesitation, condemning the lawsuit as a “stunt.” Gov. Jerry Brown says the Trump administration “is basically going to war against the state of California, the engine of the American economy—it’s not wise, it’s not right, and it will not stand.”

Sen. Dianne Feinstein echoed Brown’s sentiments about Trump’s anti-California bias, calling out the administration for continuing to “attack California in an attempt to score points with the president’s political base. These attacks are unacceptable and will not be tolerated.”

State Senate leader Kevin de Leon, who is running for U.S. Senate, called the lawsuit a “racist and xenophobic attack,” and noted California has a history of winning in court against the Trump administration.

The Trump administration has repeatedly attacked sanctuary cities — and has repeatedly lost in court. A week after taking office, Trump issued an executive order seeking to deny funding to sanctuary cities, a move blocked by a federal court.

Later, Sessions sought to withhold grant funds from cities that refused to cooperate with federal immigration officials. Once again, a judge blocked the action.

Trump’s rhetoric around immigration and sanctuary cities has been both racist and misleading. Trump began his presidential campaign by calling Mexican immigrants “rapists,” attacked a federal judge because of his Mexican heritage, vowed to end the DACA program (which provides legal protections to hundreds of thousands of Dreamers), and more recently referred to Haiti and African nations as “sh*thole countries.

Regarding sanctuary cities, both Trump and Sessions sought to use fear-mongering about crime rates as a way to push forward anti-immigrant policies. But their attacks are not based in facts.

According to the Center for American Progress, “Crime is statistically significantly lower in sanctuary counties compared to nonsanctuary counties.” Further, NBC News notes, “The number of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. tripled between the 1990s and 2013, while violent crime declined 48 percent and property crime fell 41 percent over that period.”

Additionally, a 2013 study confirmed immigration is strongly associated with less violence in a neighborhood, and “even more so in areas with sanctuary policies,” according to

Police told NBC News that Trump’s anti-immigrant policies may increase crime in immigrant communities.

Brown, de Leon, and Becerra are on the side of California voters, who overwhelmingly support immigrants as “a benefit to the state because of their hard work and job skills.”

The Trump administration will continue to attack immigrants, and leaders who believe that diversity is good for America will continue to fight back — and probably continue to win.